TON Grants Application Guide
Based on real data from 403 applications (103 approved, 300 rejected) Source: Questbook platform — "TON Grants" program, March 2026
Program Overview
The TON Grants program is one of the largest in Web3 by application volume (~2000+ apps). It funds projects building on The Open Network (TON) blockchain, including DeFi, gaming, infrastructure, wallets, and developer tooling.
Key Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Applications Analyzed | 403 |
| Approved | 103 |
| Rejected | 300 |
| Approval Rate | 26% |
| Rejection Rate | 74% |
Budget Ranges (Approved Applications)
- Minimum approved: $1
- Median approved: $3
- Maximum approved: $5K
- Sample size: 9 apps with budget data
What TON Reviewers Look For
1. TON Ecosystem Integration
- Explicit TON features: TON Connect, Jettons, NFT standards, TON Storage, TON DNS
- Telegram Mini Apps: High priority — apps that run as Telegram bots or mini-apps get preferential consideration
- User onboarding: TON's primary advantage is Telegram's 900M user base; show how you tap it
2. Technical Specificity
- Smart contract language (FunC or Tact) + why you chose it
- Architecture diagram or description
- Key on-chain interactions described (not just "we will build")
- Testing strategy (testnet deployment plan)
3. Milestone Structure
Each milestone should contain:
- Clear deliverable (code, deployed contract, documentation)
- Verifiable completion criteria (can a reviewer check this?)
- Realistic timeline (1–3 months per milestone)
- Associated budget amount
4. Team Credentials
- GitHub profile with relevant code
- Telegram / TON community presence
- Previous projects (even personal/hobby projects count)
- For TON specifically: experience with FunC/Tact or Telegram bot development helps enormously
5. Community Impact
- How many TON/Telegram users will benefit?
- Does it complement existing TON ecosystem projects?
- Open source? (TON strongly prefers open-source)
Common Rejection Patterns
- Team credibility issues: 31/136 (23%)
- Sustainability unclear: 22/136 (16%)
- Scope too broad: 19/136 (14%)
- Out of ecosystem scope: 13/136 (10%)
- Weak milestone structure: 10/136 (7%)
Approved Proposal Examples
Example 1: 0
Description: 0
Example 2: 0
Description: 0
Milestones: There are several large projects, Hamster Combat, Mask Empire and Catizen. Our advantage is balanced mechanics, detailed onboarding and presentation with humor
Budget: We have 700k users right now and 60k DAU
Example 3: 0
Description: 0
Application Checklist
Before submitting to TON Grants:
- Project directly uses TON blockchain (not just "compatible with")
- Mention of Telegram integration or Telegram user benefits
- Smart contract language specified (FunC or Tact)
- Milestones with deliverables + completion criteria
- Budget broken down by component
- Team section with verifiable links (GitHub, Telegram)
- Open-source license specified (MIT / Apache preferred)
- Previous work or portfolio linked
- KPIs defined (user counts, transaction volume, integrations)
- Post-grant maintenance plan
TON-Specific Tips
- Telegram Mini Apps: If your project can run inside Telegram, emphasize this — it's a massive distribution advantage
- FunC vs Tact: Tact is newer and higher-level; FunC shows deeper ecosystem knowledge. Both are accepted
- TON Connect: Wallet integration using TON Connect is the standard — mention it
- Jettons: TON's fungible token standard — if your project involves tokens, use Jettons
- Ecosystem fit: TON reviewers care deeply about complementing existing TON projects — do your research on what's already built
Resources
- TON Developer Docs: https://docs.ton.org
- Questbook TON Grants: https://questbook.app
- TON Connect: https://docs.ton.org/develop/dapps/ton-connect
- TON Community: https://t.me/toncoin
Data: AgentRel analysis of Questbook GraphQL API. 403 applications analyzed, March 2026.